<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My two cents on Theology of the Body, part VI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://novantiqua.com/2009/07/28/my-two-cents-on-theology-of-the-body-part-vi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://novantiqua.com/2009/07/28/my-two-cents-on-theology-of-the-body-part-vi/</link>
	<description>New editions of hard-to-find or out-of-print books.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:23:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://novantiqua.com/2009/07/28/my-two-cents-on-theology-of-the-body-part-vi/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://novantiqua.com/?p=431#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Mr. Keiser,

Thank you for this series of posts on the deficiencies of the Theology of the Body. It helps me put into words the problems I see with it, but am hesitant to mention to other young Catholics.

This post was especially good. You are right to call the TOB crowd out on their use of a strawman worthy of Hugh Hefner. The idea that Catholics in the past were simply repressed prudes is ridiculous, and should be obviously false to any decently educated Catholic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Keiser,</p>
<p>Thank you for this series of posts on the deficiencies of the Theology of the Body. It helps me put into words the problems I see with it, but am hesitant to mention to other young Catholics.</p>
<p>This post was especially good. You are right to call the TOB crowd out on their use of a strawman worthy of Hugh Hefner. The idea that Catholics in the past were simply repressed prudes is ridiculous, and should be obviously false to any decently educated Catholic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
